Responsible Technology: Business Solutions by/for Women

November 2005 Volume III Number 5

Net Contents
I. Network Presentation
Key Learnings
Perspectives

II. What’s New
February 9: Luncheon Panel

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network
Contact Information
Sponsorship Opportunities

I. Network Presentation
A big thank you to those who took the time to attend WNSF’s luncheon panel on November 17, 2005 entitled “Responsible Technology: Business Solutions by/for Women.” The event, hosted by Verizon Wireless and Burson Marsteller at Burson’s offices in New York City, featured speakers from Verizon Wireless, Microsoft and Intel highlighting how their companies have used technology for socially responsible ends.

Key Findings

  • Numerous CSR initiatives are affected–and can be improved–by technology.
  • Companies are finding creative solutions to myriad social problems using their tech savvy in various ways:
    • Verizon Wireless has a “HopeLine®” to tackle domestic violence.
    • Microsoft is working to broaden ‘digital inclusion’ to the underserved by improving access to technology and training.
    • Intel is taking an active role in defining the CSR field as part of the European Commission’s work on CSR Communication.
  • Noting that both CSR and technology are fast-changing fields, tech companies are generally lobbying for the so-called voluntary approach over government regulation.
  • The role of women–from factory production lines to government negotiating tables–is central to the tech industry, and the sector is increasingly considering their particular needs.
  • Some social ills that particularly affect women, such as domestic violence, can also be lessened by technology.

Perspectives

Moderator: Ann Goodman, Executive Director, WNSF.

Speakers:

  • Debra Lewis, Manager of Public Affairs, Verizon Wireless
  • Danielle Harder, Sr. Program Manager, Microsoft
  • Karina Howley, Ireland Government Affairs & European CSR Manager, Intel

Debi Lewis, Manager of Public Affairs at Verizon Wireless, outlined Verizon’s CSR program entitled “HopeLine,” which focuses on preventing domestic violence. The program provides a “communications link” between victims of domestic violence and the outside world–including family, friends, counselors, and/or the court system–from which they are often forcibly cut off. Through this program, Verizon accepts no-longer-used wireless phones and accessories, refurbishes them and makes them accessible to victims of domestic violence through non-profit agencies and organizations. Verizon Wireless has identified domestic violence as a serious business issue, affecting women at all corporate levels, and contributing to employee absence, reducing productivity and impacting workplace safety.

The HopeLine program benefits Verizon Wireless in various ways:

  • Regulatory/Policy – by having the company’s stores take back phones and accessories, Verizon Wireless is proactively taking part in electronics recycling initiatives
  • Marketing:
    • Drives store traffic: As people come to drop off phones, they may take the time to look at other phones or plans.
    • Connects to sponsorships and partnerships: The company uses the program to raise awareness about the issue and implement “take back” programs.
    • Raises awareness of new phones through a Celebrity Phone Auction on eBay
  • Community Relations:

* Customers sometimes choose Verizon Wireless because of the social program. Verizon Wireless has collected more than 2.5 million phones since October 2001. Some 30,000 have been donated to organizations to distribute to victims. The company has also donated over $9 million in cash, phones and airtime. By taking back its phones, the company has managed to keep over 200 tons of waste out of landfills and recycle nearly 78,000 lbs of batteries.

Danielle Harder, Microsoft’s Senior Program Manager, grouped the company’s Citizenship program into three categories:

  • Improving Security and Internet Safety, by protecting children online, preventing computer crimes (hacking & viruses), identifying theft and so-called phishing, maintaining privacy, controlling spam, and the like.
  • Advancing the Knowledge Economy via digital inclusion, by providing ICT skills training to a quarter billion people previously underserved by technology by 2010.
  • Ensuring Responsible Business Practices, largely by working with suppliers and the greater electronics industry to create and implement a common electronics industry code of conduct (www.eicc.info).

Karina Howley, Intel’s CSR Manager in Ireland, the company’s manufacturing and technology center in Europe, outlined Intel’s involvement with the CSR process at the European Commission. Karina stressed the need for innovation in CSR programs, which she says require a voluntary approach, versus the traditional regulatory approach. Intel defines corporate responsibility as “doing what is right, respecting people and the world around us.” One major component of Intel’s CSR initiative is the “Intel Involved” program that offers employees opportunities to volunteer with organizations in the local community.

A third of Intel’s employees in Ireland last year volunteered through the program. The company is also actively involved in education through programs such as Intel Teach to the Future.

II. What’s New

  • February 9, 2006 luncheon panel: “For Good Measure: Metrics for CSR, hosted by Deloitte & Touche, with speakers from Deloitte, Alcoa and Ford Motor Co. Look for details and on the WNSF website (www.wnsf.org).

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

The Network provides a forum for business and professional women to congregate, reflect, and act on the converging issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Through meetings and simple electronic support tools, the Network aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences and best practices on these vital workplace issues. By creating a new network of executive women, the Network seeks to improve responsible practices in workplaces; sensitize corporate culture more generally to issues of sustainability and social responsibility; and encourage a public commitment locally, nationally, and internationally to sustainability principles.

The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future is a 501c3 organization. Gifts are tax deductible.

For more information, please contact:
Ann Goodman, Executive Director
Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
Please direct inquiries to: info@wnsf.org

Board of Directors:

CHAIR: Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President, Interface Inc.; Karen Flanders, Director, Sustainability, Coca-Cola Co.; Joanne Fox-Przeworski, Director, Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Bard College; Ann Goodman, Executive Director, WNSF; Sarah Howell, Director, Corporate Communications, BP; Michele Kahane, Special Projects Director, Corporate Citizenship Program, Boston College; Clair Krizov, Executive Director of Environmental and Social Responsibility, AT&T; Kathy Robb, Esq., Partner and Head of Environmental Practice, Hunton & Williams; Deborah Sliter, Vice President of Programs, National Environmental Education & Training Foundation of Sustainability.

This issue of Net Notes was written by Monika Kumar and edited by Ann Goodman. WNSF thanks founding sponsors AT&T and the Ford Foundation for their generous support.

Posted in Peer Learning Sessions | Tagged | Leave a comment

Preserving Natural Capital, Building Financial Capital

October 2005 Volume III Number 4

Net Contents
I. Network Presentation
Key Learnings
Perspectives

II. What’s New
November 17: Luncheon Panel
December 8: Luncheon Panel

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network
Contact Information
Sponsorship Opportunities

I. Network Presentation
A big thank you to those who took the time to attend WNSF’s luncheon panel on October 18, 2005, “Preserving Natural Capital, Building Financial Capital.” The event was hosted by Praxair and Smith Barney at the investment firm’s offices in New York City. The session featured four specialists on socially responsible investing, emphasizing the opportunities for women, as corporate professionals and personal investors.

Key Findings:

  • SRI is a growing trend
  • SRI is still dominated by specialty firms, but interest by mainstream investment firms is rising
  • Social investors and companies now work more as partners, less as opponents
  • Corporate concern for social investors has to be considered strategically, with an eye to the future
  • A company’s positive rating in an SRI index, like other CSR initiatives, boosts employee morale
  • SRI funds no longer function just as screens against so-called sin stocks
  • SRI returns appear to be equivalent to, if not better than, ordinary investments
  • Individuals, like institutional investors, have the clout to vote their shares on the basis of their values

Perspectives

Moderator: Ann Goodman, Executive Director, WNSF.

Speakers:

  • Bruce Kahn, Environmental Scientist and Financial Consultant, Smith Barney
  • Liz Hirsch, Director of Investor Relations at Praxair
  • Leslie Lowe, Program Director of Energy and the Environment at the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR)
  • Sister Patricia Daly, Executive Director, Tri-State Coalition for Responsible Investment (ICCR member organization)

Bruce Kahn, Environmental Scientist and Financial Consultant at Smith Barney provided the audience with a brief overview of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), which integrates personal values and societal concerns with investment decisions. Sustainability is an emerging area of interest in the markets and SRI considers both the investor’s financial needs and investment’s impact on society. Mr. Kahn’s mission is to carry out business that focuses on emerging environmental technology companies and corporations that are leaders in their sustainability and management practices and serve clients that have the vision to make their investments deliver the highest financial returns while also restoring environmental value to our distressed ecosystems. KEY POINTS:

  • Industry people have transitioned to SRI
  • Mutual funds today are negative and positive investing funds, alternative energy, etc.
  • In terms of sacrificing investment returns by SRI, returns are equivalent if not better; growth in eco-efFiciency (companies that are more eco-efficient perform better)
  • “Greenwashing” – are companies doing what they say? The area to adopt better practices is growing
  • Interested investors include individual, endowments and foundations
  • Individuals can actively vote the shares or proxies to mutual funds that they own (shareholder activism is transforming Wall Street)

Liz Hirsch, Director of Investor Relations at Praxair, a global industrial gas company, works with her company to establish goals to educate the SRI community. Praxair’s principal business is a renewable resource – to separate air into its component gases (oxygen, nitrogen, argon) and sell to hundreds of thousands of customers across diverse end markets. To respond to the increasing NUMBER OF questions posed by SRI and CSR surveys and inquiries Praxair (1) rewrote corporate governance policies and standards to exceed those required by SEC and NYS; (2) formed Sustainability Council (2003), chaired by SVP and CFO; (3) established Principles of Sustainability to be integrated into business policy and decision making; (4) published their first Sustainability Report (2003) – sent to shareholders and employees; (5) upgraded the CSR portion of their website and; (6) held first focused presentation for SRI investors in NYC (2004).

Ms. Hirsch continued to explain the importance of CSR to Praxair:

  • Praxair believes that its products and technologies will grow in importance relative to the strategic challenge of global sustainability
  • The “right thing to do” (social and environmental)
  • The business case – CSR contributes to superior financial performance – the more profitable the company, the more likely its strengths and capabilities can be leveraged for the public and environmental good
  • Business growth must be integrated with quality of life
  • Thought process being integrated into day to day decision making
  • Employee awareness
  • Implementation of CSR initiatives is a continuing journey

As Program Director of Energy and the Environment at the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR), Leslie Lowe assists ICCR’s members in corporate dialogues and filing resolutions to engage management regarding sustainability and environmental practices. ICCR tries to educate others on the business case of sustainability and is focused on the idea that sustainable environmental management is good management. Ms. Lowe shared her views as an activist on global warming:

  • Companies must be conscious of resource use, emissions, and productivity
  • Shareholder risks include off-balance sheet environmental liabilities as well as those on the balance sheet
  • SEC must do a better job of getting companies to report non-financial liabilities

Sister Patricia Daly’s two decades of dedication has led her organization, the Tri-State Coalition for Responsible Investment, and ICCR, to become two of the nation’s most effective crusaders for corporate responsibility. As a leader of environmental advocacy, Sister Pat has seen change initiated by congregations of women and men – active members of social and environmental empowerment. Global warming continues to be an economic issue and companies are now saving money by practicing responsibly. Today, ICCR and Tri-State CRI members “sit down and talk” with corporations in order to keep them on top of the science and new initiatives. In terms of lessons to be learned, Sister Pat emphasized the following:

  • Be watchful of changes that take place in the environment in relation to corporate activities
  • Look outside 15 or 20 years in terms of sustainability – what steps does a company need to take in the in the next two years in order to get to where in needs to be in 15?
  • Train new people to think of business planning in addressing the externalities – sustainability should be included in business decisions

II. What’s New

  • November 17 luncheon panel: “Responsible Technology: Business Solutions by/for Women,” with speakers from Verizon Wireless, Microsoft and Intel, co-hosted by Verizon Wireless and Burson Marsteller at Burson’s NYC Headquarters, noon to 2pm.
  • December 8 luncheon panel: “Redefining Diversity for Global Business,” with speakers from Philips Van Heusen (PVH), JP Morgan Chase and others, hosted by PVH, noon to 2pm.
  • For both panels, look for details and on the WNSF website (www.wnsf.org).

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

The Network provides a forum for business and professional women to congregate, reflect, and act on the converging issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Through meetings and simple electronic support tools, the Network aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences and best practices on these vital workplace issues. By creating a new network of executive women, the Network seeks to improve responsible practices in workplaces; sensitize corporate culture more generally to issues of sustainability and social responsibility; and encourage a public commitment locally, nationally, and internationally to sustainability principles.

The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future is a 501c3 organization. Gifts are tax deductible.

For more information, please contact:
Ann Goodman, Executive Director
Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
Please direct inquiries to: info@wnsf.org

Board of Directors:

CHAIR: Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President, Interface Inc.; Muni Figueres, formerly of the Costa Rican Foundation for Sustainable Development; Joanne Fox-Przeworski, Director, Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Bard College; Ann Goodman, Executive Director, WNSF; Sarah Howell, Director, Corporate Communications, BP; Michele Kahane, Special Projects Director, Corporate Citizenship Program, Boston College; Clair Krizov, Executive Director of Environmental and Social Responsibility, AT&T; Kathy Robb, Esq., Partner and Head of Environmental Practice, Hunton & Williams; Deborah Sliter, Vice President of Programs, National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.

This issue of Net Notes was written by Fabiola Dieudonne and edited by Ann Goodman. WNSF thanks founding sponsors AT&T and the Ford Foundation for their generous support.

Posted in Peer Learning Sessions | Tagged | Leave a comment

Second Annual Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Summit

September 29, 2005

“Second Annual Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Summit”

Presented by the Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future with Catalyst

MAKING A DIFFERENCE

The Second Annual Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Summit, presented by the Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future, was based on the strength of one unifying theme, “Making a Difference.” Established on key sustainability principles identified at the inaugural Summit in 2004—integrity, diversity, environment and community engagement—the event offered executive women a unique forum in which to exchange best practices and co-create tools for leadership on corporate responsibility and sustainability.

The Summit offered women business leaders the chance to network and meet others with shared interests from various companies and in other industries, and to learn about experiences and best practices that have influenced business responsibility and sustainability. In a plenary conversation, as well as breakout sessions on four aspects of the business of making a difference, attendees discussed the importance of linking good citizenship to company performance, and securing the interest of the company in the long run.

Attendees were welcomed by Michelle R. Ferguson, Senior Vice President of Real Estate and Human Resources Services for The McGraw-Hill Companies, who has been responsible for setting a global design standard for the company’s work environment. Ms. Ferguson has been heavily involved in the development of a companywide women’s initiative, and she encouraged attendees to take advantage of the networking possibilities throughout the day to help build relationships centered on advancing the cause of sustainability.

Keynote speaker Terri Ludwig, President of Merrill Lynch Community Development Company (CDC), echoed that advice. She went on to explain how she developed the CDC business philosophy, based on a double bottom line approach that measures both social and financial impact of investments. After taking the audience through a journey of personal and professional challenges and successes from kindergarten to Wall Street, Ms. Ludwig spoke of her passion to make a difference in the lives of the poverty-stricken and their communities, which eventually led her to work in the field of micro-lending, where she had the opportunity to help struggling women build businesses. She encouraged the audience to step back, discover their passion, and use that passion to help create a much kinder and sustainable world.

The Business of Making a Difference

The Community breakout session called “Can’t We All Just Get Along? A Stakeholders’ Dialogue,” moderated by WNSF Board member, Michele Kahane, included:

  • Anita Roper, Director of Sustainability at Alcoa, who talked about how harnessing the company’s values, resources, processes and products, Alcoa can simultaneously achieve financial, environmental and social responsibility success, partly through partnerships. Stakeholders now want and expect to be included in co-developing processes that will protect the community and lead it toward a sustainable future.
  • Assheton Steward Carter, Senior Director of Strategic Planning, Energy and Mining at the Center for Environmental Leadership in Business at Conservation International talked about the value of partnerships between leading companies such as Alcoa and NGO stakeholders in the area of conservation and introduced measures of success that help identify the value this brings to regions that are committed to developing positive initiatives.
  • As Director of Development for the National Council of Churches, John Briscoe works with Alcoa to open up a dialogue with local churches and encourage them to weigh in on community issues. While providing education between church issues and environmental issues, the partnership allows for a healthy outlook on the issue of sustainability.

Speakers in the Environment session, “Assets for Life: Water, Power, Health and Profit,” discussed the importance of sustainability in their companies and the challenges faced in making a difference:

  • Mary Jane Klocke, Director of North American Shareholder Marketing at BP said her company reaches out to the socially responsible investment community and aims to maximize shareholder value. The second largest energy company worldwide, BP is building trust and credibility by working on corporate citizenship initiatives globally. Its greatest challenge continues to be climate change; BP has been a leader on the issue since 1997 and is currently working on a project with Algerian company Sonotrac which captures CO2 from during the refining process and then and injects it into specially protected sites (CK).
  • Karen Flanders, Director of Sustainability at Coca-Cola, emphasized the importance of working on the issue of sustainability. “Damage to the brand equals damage to the business,” she explained. For Coca-Cola, being responsible creates value to both the business and the community. Current provisions include self-assessment tools used by bottlers and suppliers, operational performance standards and a supplier guiding principal program. Coca-Cola has chosen to take on the challenge of water preservation (three liters of water are used to produce each liter of Coca-Cola product) by building alliances with national programs to protect water resources.
  • Elizabeth C. Girardi-Shoen, Senior Director of Environment, Health and Safety, Strategic Partnerships & Planning at Pfizer, Inc., encourages corporate citizenship to reach the goal of sustainability. The major challenges faced by Pfizer are conservation and clean energy. Because waste is a byproduct of solvents used to make pharmaceutical products, Pfizer is working to reduce the amount of chemicals used, while increasing production by recycling solvents internally and/or externally.
  • Vanessa De Villez, Director of Sustainability at ConEdison, talked about the company’s efforts to improve the environment of communities it works in. ConEd currently creates labor-management committees to bring out best management practices and helps local businesses secure loans. The company’s greatest challenges are re-mediating former manufacturing sites contaminated with coal tar and reducing the amount of energy and gas used in production.

The speakers agreed that the greatest intangible value in promoting a healthy environment is preserving brand value. When asked what action they would like to see taken to boost the issue of social responsibility and sustainability on the corporate agenda, panelists pointed to the need for more guidelines to reduce, reuse or recycle materials and waste, and more innovative ways to use materials. They also mentioned that by using marketing muscle, companies can make these issues more appealing to corporate management.

The session entitled “Integrity: School for Scandal: Lessons of Corporate Fraud,” explored business ethics through a recounting of first-hand experience. The session featured WNSF Advisory Council member Noreen Harrington, Wall Street veteran and Managing Partner and CIO of Globalview Partners, who initiated the investigation into illegal practices in the mutual fund industry. Joining her in dialogue was David Brown, Chief of the Investment Protection Bureau of the New York Attorney General’s Office, who worked with Ms. Harrington to expose fraud in the industry. He explained the concept of late trading, and discussed how a failure of responsibility on the part of some traders, coupled by tolerance on the part of some mutual funds and hedge funds, eventually led to overcharging of investors. Ms. Harrington initially contacted the Attorney General’s office because she wanted to protect the industry’s reputation and believed she had an inherent responsibility to “say something.”

The speakers examined how to change the way people think and behave in regard to corporate ethics, agreeing on steps that need to be taken, including:

  • Passing new laws, because as long as fraud is profitable, it is likely to exist.
  • Encouraging Boards of Directors to be responsive towards shareholders.
  • Encourage corporate responsibility.

Mr. Brown concluded that ethics must prevail in business because, “If you don’t have a mass belief that the system works, you will see incredible damage.”

The Diversity session, “Building Success: Women and Entrepreneurship,” introduced three female entrepreneurs who built new businesses with a socially responsible base, though not always consciously or deliberately. The session was moderated by Joyce LaValle, WNSF Board Member and Senior Vice President of Human Resources at Interface Americas, a carpet company that has become a world-renowned leader in sustainability.

  • Tanya Rynd, co-founder of Superfine, spoke of her restaurant and bar based in Brooklyn, which she conceived, designed, and built with two women partners, Laura Taylor and Cara Lee Sparry. Superfine incorporates local art, music, design and performance in an active forum for collaboration in the arts-based local Brooklyn community known as Dumbo. The entrepreneurs are committed to the ideal of sustainable agriculture, changing the menu each day reflecting the availability of only the freshest ingredients. The chefs use organic poultry and pork and grass-fed beef. The seasonal produce is organic and comes, whenever possible, from local farmers. By remaining committed to the health of the planet and the health of the community, Superfine creates a unique dining experience, as well as a loyal customer base.
  • Crystal Mario, President of Rivanna Natural Designs, Inc., founded the company on one central operating principle: in its every aspect, the company’s work must reflect its strong obligation to clients, coworkers, community, and the environment. Rivanna is a leading provider of environmentally responsible corporate gifts and awards with clients in 34 states and Canada. Working with the Charlottesville, N.C., office of the International Rescue Committee, Rivanna hires and trains recently arrived refugees, most of whom are women. In addition, a portion of Rivanna’s profits is set aside for the purchase of books and other resource materials for the company’s Learning Center, which offers English-as-a-Second Language and basic computer skills to refugee-workers. Employees craft products from recycled materials or sustainably-harvested forest products.
  • Rebecca Steinman, Owner and Co-Founder of Quist Industries, Ltd., a full service screen printing, embroidery, & garment finishing company, explained how Quist did not begin with a social vision, but progressed into social consciousness when it moved its offices to Red Hook, Brooklyn. The area had been economically depressed for a few decades, and Quist wanted to contribute to the sense of community that was developing in the area. Quist began to work closely with the Southwest Brooklyn Industrial Development Corp. to solicit resumes of local residents as they began the hiring process. It became immediately apparent that there was an opportunity to be part of the fabric of the area and that business was vital to the progress of the community. Quist continues to stay active in the community by bartering with local small business and working with nonprofits, as well as enforcing ethical business practices and social awareness. Quist ensures that materials it uses are re-used and recycled and that only non-toxic (CK) chemicals are used. Ms. Steinman believes that as an environmentally friendly company, Quist is responsible for putting into effect its standards of sustainable business.

Eileen Fisher Award Presentation

WNSF honored Eileen Fisher, entrepreneur and advocate of women, with the first Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Award. In building her renowned business, Ms. Fisher has continued to aim for the highest standards of social responsibility, including:

  • Advocating high labor standards for the women who work in the Chinese factories where the clothes of Eileen Fisher, Inc. are manufactured;
  • Philanthropic programs for disadvantaged women and women entrepreneurs and;
  • Developing new commitments to social and environmental responsibility throughout the company’s operations.

In honoring Eileen Fisher with the award (donated by Rivanna Natural Designs, Inc.), WNSF recognized her exceptional contribution as a pioneering businesswoman and as a role model for businesswomen everywhere. Her courage and success in identifying what matters to women, her tireless advocacy of women in the many aspects of their lives, and her championship in her own company of business social responsibility in its many forms, all reflect what WNSF promotes as an organization and through the award.

Executive Women as a Force for Change

Ann Goodman presented attendees with results of a survey conducted jointly with the UK firm Aspire that explored what making a difference means to executive women. Survey respondents included women in management positions across a range of functions, from a wide spectrum of industry sectors, who were in their prime earning years. Some key results of the survey include:

  • 57% of women surveyed said they want to influence the world outside the market place compared to 25% who want to make an impact solely on their company
  • 92% of women expect business to make a difference in the world, stating it is “important” or “very important”
  • 80% of women want their companies to offer more opportunities to make a difference
  • 95% of women answered “important” or “very important” to supporting labor and human rights practices as CSR activities that makes a difference.
  • 73% of women are making a difference through their personal efforts or with like-minded colleagues

Such results indicate that executive women want business to make a difference and want business to give them the opportunity to make a difference.

Plenary Panel: Executive Women Making a Difference

Following the survey results, a plenary panel of executive women exchanged discussed the importance of making a difference throughout their careers. The panel included:

Sheila Wellington, moderator, Clinical Professor of Management, NYU Stern School of Business and former President of Catalyst
Dianne Dillon-Ridgley, Director, Interface, Inc. and longtime advocate of sustainability and women’s rights through numerous nonprofit organizations
Morag Watson, Vice President of Digital and Communications Technology, BP
Pamela I. Anderson, Managing Director, JP Morgan Private Bank

The panelists agreed that making a difference means helping others achieve their potential. Ms. Watson said that we must share whatever is learned, helping others learn from our experiences. At a time when the world is becoming more diverse and constantly changing how it does business, “companies have to look more like the world to be profitable,” said Ms. Anderson. She also mentioned a study done by Catalyst that showed a positive correlation between women in leadership and return on investments.

Each speaker stressed the professional advantages of networking and Ms. Dillon -Ridgley encouraged attendees to be aggressive and proactive to gather people into their lives. Ms. Anderson pointed out that men network more easily than women and that we must develop the skill of getting to know each other.

Each panelist left attendees with key take away points to incorporate into making a difference within their companies and their lives:

  • There is no set definition of sustainability. Each company must find its own definition and then design programs around it
  • There is both tangible and intangible value to companies in encouraging sustainability
  • Executive women should develop professional intimacy, going beyond the comfort zone
  • There are numerous ways to make a difference at work and to encourage companies to do so
  • Being a mentor or a reverse mentor can help executive women make a difference
  • Networking is essential in making a difference

Concluding Plenary Address

The summit ended with a motivating closing address by Sanna Lindberg, President of H&M Americas. H & M is committed to corporate social responsibility and has consistently demonstrated its concern through social and environmental welfare initiatives. The company performs internal audits and fosters improved communication with stakeholders. While Ms. Lindberg has a background in sales, rather than corporate citizenship, she sees similar goals for each: promoting good working conditions, cleaner environment and good labor relations. She encourages this by being open minded, listening to the staff, and informing and training staff people on CSR issues. Ultimately, she considers forums such as those held by WNSF, and the simple exchange of information to staff, customers and friends, helpful contributions to establishing greater knowledge and practice of business responsibility.

Posted in Summit Reports | Leave a comment

Reputation and Responsibility: The Corporate Connection

July 2005 Volume III Number 3

Net Contents
I. Network Presentation
Key Learnings
Perspectives

II. What’s New

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

I. Network Presentation
A big thank you to those who took the time to attend WNSF’s luncheon panel on June 21, 2005: “Reputation and Responsibility: The Corporate Connection.” The event was hosted by Dow Jones at the offices of Hunton & Williams in New York City. The session featured three corporate efforts to integrate corporate social responsibility with brand and reputation in the marketplace, as well as commentary from Wall Street Journal editor Ron Alsop based on his book “The 18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation.” The cases demonstrated how corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts can boost public trust and help protect a company’s reputation in trying circumstances.

Key Findings

  • Companies can exert influence over their reputations.
  • Social responsibility initiatives can build public trust and bolster corporate reputation.
  • Corporate reputations can be rebuilt after tumbling if the company is willing to listen and apologize to consumers and other stakeholders.
  • Staying in touch with customers, stakeholders and changing public values is essential to preserving reputation.
  • Openness and communication trump silence and defensiveness in building trust and bolstering reputation.
  • Increasingly reputation depends on the blend of a company’s impact on consumers and its footprint on society and the environment.

Perspectives

Introduction: Ann Goodman, Executive Director, WNSF.

Moderator: Sarah Howell, Director, Corporate Communications, BP.

Speakers:

  • Ron Alsop, Wall Street Journal editor and writer.
  • Bill Nielsen, special counsel to the CEO of Johnson & Johnson and retired Vice President, Public Affairs.
  • Karen Daragan, Vice President of Corporate Affairs, Strategy and Social Responsibility, Altria Corporate Services.
  • Margaret Laney, BP General Manager , Public Affairs for the Midwest and East US

At a time when corporate scandals account for an unusual number of headlines and the environmental and social impact of business draws increasing scrutiny in a fast-paced global economy, earning and maintaining a good reputation is harder for companies than ever before. Increasingly, corporate reputation depends on social responsibility, which in turn depends on the complex interaction between a company, its impact on stakeholders, and how it is perceived by consumers.

The WNSF panel speakers, a Wall Street Journal editor and reporter, and representatives from Altria, BP and Johnson & Johnson, explored an array of questions that bear on this theme, candidly sharing their inside views of image-altering change in their respective organizations. While each spoke from different experiences, the short presentations made it clear that companies can have control over their reputations. Ultimately, taking responsibility for wrongs done, contributing to the well-being of stakeholder communities, and setting ambitious social and environmental sustainability goals, are bold steps that can rebuild trust in companies whenever they stumble and wherever they operate.

Ron Alsop of the Wall Street Journal and author of The18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation ties the issue of reputation to corporate citizenship. He began his presentation with two provocative questions: “Can companies publicize their corporate citizenship in a credible manner without appearing self-serving? Can companies take up a cause and become associated with it?” Much of his work on corporate reputation aims to answer these questions. “Companies rarely realizereputation’s full value—how a sterling reputation can enhance business in good times, protect it in turbulent times, and be destroyed in an instant by people at the lowest or highest levels of the corporate ladder,” Alsop writes. His book is a practical guide to corporate reputation and firmly asserts that bolstering it is the way companies can win over the public. Among the topics addressed in the book are:

  • How to protect your reputation when the inevitable crisis hits
  • How to cope with cyberspace’s many hazards
  • How to become the model corporate citizen
  • How to create a reputation for vision and industry leadership
  • How to establish a culture of ethical behavior
  • How to measure and monitor your ever-changing public image
  • How to achieve consistency in your identity
  • How to decide when it’s time to change your name

The centrality of these issues was brought to life in the panel’s remaining presentations. Bill Nielsen, retired Vice President of Public Affairs at Johnson & Johnson, frequently cited as a company with the top reputation, said “reputations are terribly important to successful business organizations today…probably more important when you’re in trouble.” Nielsen acknowledged the fragility of trust between Johnson & Johnson and its consumers. Knowing that customer satisfaction meant that women in particular would make recommendations to their own daughters and “take up the ‘cause’ of the company,” Johnson & Johnson worked hard to build a level of what Nielsen called “sustainable trust” with its customers. That’s mainly because consumer trust, when violated, could only be built or rebuilt when the company was willing to apologize. In Nielsen’s experience, customers would again be receptive to the company only after they felt heard.

Highlighting the process of corporate reflection, Nielsen added: “Rebuilding public trust is based on examining attitudes of shareholders, consumers, employees–spearheading ‘public interest’ issues.” He outlined a three-pronged approach to this reflection, guided by the questions: What do we know? What do we think about what we know? How should what we believe about what we know guide our actions?

Ultimately, Nielsen concluded, “Companies ought to act toward principles before they are made to do so. They should be the first to speak about what they believe and what they are doing.” And Nielsen’s former role was just that–he worked to ensure that the company’s values were upheld throughout its vast operations as growth and the influx of newcomers puts new people in key decision-making posts in the company. For Johnson & Johnson, principles are derived from the company credo, which enumerates its commitments and responsibilities to its customers, employees, community stakeholders, and shareholders.

The full credo can be viewed at: http://www.jnj.com/our_company/our_credo/.

Karen Daragan, Vice President of Corporate Affairs, Strategy and Social Responsibility, Altria Corporate Services, spoke on behalf of Altria Group, parent company of Kraft Foods, Philip Morris USA and Philip Morris International (the firm changed its name in 2003 from Philip Morris Companies to Altria Group to more clearly communicate that it was the parent of both food and tobacco companies). Daragan described the decline of then Philip Morris Companies’ reputation during a particularly stormy period when the firm’s tobacco companies “fell out of step with societal values.” According to Daragan, this precipitated the conglomerate’s fall from second place on Fortune’s 1990 list of most admired companies to number 202 only five years later. She said Altria’s tobacco companies displayed defensiveness toward stakeholders as concern about tobacco-related illnesses and other issues rose. The ensuing barrage of litigation brought by states, individuals, and class action lawsuits only deepened public mistrust of the domestic tobacco company Philip Morris USA and its parent Philip Morris Companies. By the late 1990s Philip Morris USA was “on the verge of losing its license to operate,” said Daragan.

For Altria Group/Philip Morris Companies, recovering from this steep decline meant realigning itself and its companies with society, by meeting or exceeding stakeholder expectations. This reckoning has meant pivotal changes in the family of companies’ internal culture. Openness to outside critique has replaced defensiveness, and the tobacco companies have acknowledged the serious health effects of smoking. In addition, the firm’s tobacco companies are seeking to reduce the harm caused by cigarettes by developing new processes and technologies and by encouraging comprehensive regulation of tobacco products. Kraft Foods is working to bolster its reputation in the food industry by partnering with experts and stakeholders in the areas of food quality and safety, health and wellness, responsible marketing practices and the sustainability of its agricultural supply base. Daragan summarized the key lessons of this turbulent period in Altria companies’ past:

  • You can’t succeed in business without the public’s trust.
  • Responsibility goes well beyond shareholders.
  • Listening is important–maybe more than talking.
  • Words with no actions fall on deaf ears.
  • Actions won’t speak louder than words if you aren’t trusted.
  • Dialogue and engagement with critics will help shape reputation.
  • Respect must be earned and takes time to rebuild.

Finally, Margaret Laney, BP General Manager, Public Affairs for the Midwest and East US described the importance of responsibility and reputation at a time when corporate scandals have provided skeptics with ready opportunities to question the propriety and ethics of the energy industry. Citing the challenge to address environmental and societal impacts in the industry, Laney said: “While we strive to be a force for good, we also understand why we continue to face skeptics.”

Through stakeholder research, BP learned that being in the energy business alone is sufficient to weigh down the company’s reputation. Distinguishing BP from the industry pack, CEO Lord John Browne made a public commitment in 1997 to reduce the company’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2010 by 10% from 1990 rates. Utilizing an internal Emissions Trading Scheme at its plants across the globe between 1999 and 2001, BP was able to reach this goal at a reasonable cost by making reductions at plants and operating sites where the changes were most cost-effective. Since then, the firm has committed to maintaining its net emissions at or below its 2001 levels over the next decade (source:http://www.pewclimate.org/companies_leading_the_way_belc/company_profiles/bp_amoco/).

According to Laney, BP’s reputation-building process is guided by four core values: performance, green, innovation, and progressive. BP focuses on objectives within—providing profits, products, jobs, capabilities, taxes and responsible operations that meet or exceed government regulation. In addition, the company is committed, within its sphere of influence, to being a leader in climate change—cutting carbon dioxide emissions and investing significant resources in renewable energy sources and cleaner-burning fuels. The company is also taking a leadership position in inclusive development—ensuring its global operations benefit the greatest number of people. Such endeavors have included investing in enterprise development, enhancing education opportunities, and enabling communities to gain access to energy resources.

Reputation, the panelists’ experiences seemed to demonstrate, is the outcome of a company’s impact on consumers and its footprint on society and the environment. Companies can recover from missteps if they are honest with themselves and those they have affected. By choosing to value the short and long-term health of its consumers and stakeholder communities, listening, and thoughtfully reformulating operation policies, firms can earn the public’s trust even as shareholders continue to benefit. As Alsop puts it “reputation is your most valuable asset” and strategic investment in it can only have a positive impact on the bottom line.

II. What’s New
In mid-July WNSF presented a session entitled “Building a Sustainable Future: The Role of Women in Business” at the Forte Foundation’s conference for women MBA students. Presenters included Dianne Dillon-Ridgely, a Director at Interface Inc. and a member of WNSF’s Advisory Council, Ann Goodman, WNSF’s Executive Director, and Michele Kahane, Director of Special Projects at the Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College and a member of WNSF’s Board of Directors. The conference session was adapted from WNSF’s Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Workshop designed for internal corporate women’s networks. To learn how WNSF can tailor the workshop for your company’s women’s network, contact WNSF Executive Director Ann Goodman (please direct inquiries to info@wnsf.org).

WNSF’s second annual Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Summit will take place on September 29 in New York City. Building on the insights captured at last year’s Summit, this unique, daylong event for executive women will suggest new avenues of thought and action on social responsibility and sustainability and provide opportunities to exchange experiences and best practices in a high level, candid setting. $100 per person. Space is limited. For more information and to register see WNSF’s website (www.wnsf.org). Sponsors include: Alcoa Inc., BP, Coca-Cola, Con Edison, Eileen Fisher Inc., McGraw-Hill Cos., Merrill Lynch, Pfizer, Starbucks. For sponsorship opportunities, contact Executive Director Ann Goodman (please direct inquiries to info@wnsf.org).

The next luncheon panel, “Preserving Natural Capital, Building Financial Capital,” with speakers from the Investor Center for Corporate Responsibility, Praxair and Smith Barney, will be hosted by Smith Barney on October 18. Look for details in an upcoming email invitation and on the WNSF website (www.wnsf.org). Registration will begin later this summer.

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network
The Network provides a forum for business and professional women to congregate, reflect, and act on the converging issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Through meetings and simple electronic support tools, the Network aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences and best practices on these vital workplace issues. By creating a new network of executive women, the Network seeks to improve responsible practices in workplaces; sensitize corporate culture more generally to issues of sustainability and social responsibility; and encourage a public commitment locally, nationally, and internationally to sustainability principles.

The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future is a 501c3 organization. Gifts are tax deductible.

For more information, please contact:
Ann Goodman, Executive Director
Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
Please direct inquiries to: info@wnsf.org

Board of Directors:
CHAIR: Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President, Interface Inc.; Muni Figueres, formerly of the Costa Rican Foundation for Sustainable Development; Joanne Fox-Przeworski, Director, Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Bard College; Ann Goodman, Executive Director, WNSF; Sarah Howell, Director, Corporate Communications, BP; Michele Kahane, Special Projects Director, Corporate Citizenship Program, Boston College; Clair Krizov, Executive Director of Environmental and Social Responsibility, AT&T; Kathy Robb, Esq., Partner and Head of Environmental Practice, Hunton & Williams; Deborah Sliter, Vice President of Programs, National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.

This issue of Net Notes was written by Jen Petersen and edited by Ann Goodman. WNSF thanks founding sponsors AT&T and the Ford Foundation for their generous support.

Posted in Peer Learning Sessions | Tagged | Leave a comment

Corporate Culture Meets Sustainability: Getting the Right Blend

April 2005 Volume III Number 2

Net Contents
I. Network Presentation
Key Learnings
Perspectives

II. What’s New

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

I. Network Presentation

  • Companies need to consider their culture when implementing CSR programs?? and look for ways to integrate ?? NEW programs that blend with and build on current practices.
  • Communicating CSR goals and policies to all employees is essential, but companies may need to use different approaches and materials with different groups of employees.
  • Supply chain management is a KEY area for CSR initiatives. Companies need to be sure their suppliers ARE ON BOARD WITH THE COMPANY’S CULTURE AND understand NEW CSR POLICIES.
  • Companies have a great opportunity to implement social programs in COMMUNITIES where they DO BUSINESS. Partnering with non-governmental organizations can be a GOOD way to do this.

Perspectives

Moderator: Ann Goodman, EXECUTIVE Director, WNSF.

Speakers:

  • Robyn Smith, TK, Colgate-Palmolive.
  • Megan T. Campbell, Director, Green Coffee, Starbucks.
  • Lisa Sandberg, Director of Communications, H&M.

Robyn Smith, TK at Colgate-Palmolive, shepherded the company’s first CSR report, “Living Our Values for Sustainability” into existence in 2004. According to Smith, Colgate-Palmolive is “generally a soft-spoken company, so this was really a big thing.”

Although COLGATE HAS not always widely published ITS commitment to CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR), THE COMPANY has been exemplifying it for many years. COLGATE IS proud of strong governance by ITS board and senior management and ITS collection of “best place to work” and “most admired company” awards.

In 1987, Colgate?? adopted a Code of Conduct, which is updated regularly. The most recent version was released in 2004. This code exemplifies the company’s commitment to ethical practices and governs its relations with stakeholders. It is published in TK languages. A copy is given to ALL employeeS, who must acknowledge in writing that they’ve received it. The company also operates a Code of Conduct Hotline where employees or other stakeholders can anonymously report cases of possibly unethical behavior.

Colgate??’S current CSR initiatives built on the COMPANY’S CODE OF CONDUCT AND core values that were already in place, INCLUDING: caring, global teamwork, and continuous improvement. Smith emphasized the importance of leveraging the programs and TERMS?? already in place and that people are ?? comfortable with TO INTRODUCE NEW CONCEPTS, LIKE CSR.

In contrast with Colgate??, Starbucks is much more outspoken about ITS CSR commitment and initiatives. ??SAID Megan T. Campbell, Director of Green Coffee: “We’re not ABOUT being a soft-spoken company. That’s not who we are.” In fact, Starbucks prints its mission statement on the back?? of its business cards.

Campbell SAID it Was fairly easy to integrate CSR into THE COMPANY’S casual, high-energy environment. She paraphrased the mission statement as “hit our numbers and live our values,” and said that people take that mission seriously. The company offers a program called “Mission Review” that provides a venue for any partner (as all Starbucks employees are called) or customer to discuss things they think the company is not doing right.

Starbucks recently released its fourth annual CSR report, entitled “Striking a Balance.” The report emphasizes WHAT Starbucks is doing to balance fiscal, social, and environmental responsibility. Although THE COMPANY has a history of publicly sharing ITS CSR commitments, STARBUCKS IS continually trying to improve. “We reserve the right to get smarter,” says Campbell.

H & M’s business concept is “fashion and quality at the best price.” ??Communications Director Lisa Sandberg SAID many people think ?? low-cost means ?? the company is not concerned with social and environmental issues. However, H & M, a Swedish company, is deeply rooted in a European approach to business that emphasizes respect, ?? environment, and corporate social responsibility.

H & M established a Code of Conduct in 1997, one of the first companies in its industry to do so. Sandberg describeD the Code as ?? a reflection of the company’s values. The company does not own any ?? factories, but it requires its suppliers to abide by the Code. Suppliers seem to be taking it seriously. “They think we’re tough,” Sandberg says, “but they appreciate the changes we’ve helped them make.”

H & M employs a team of nearly 40 full-time auditors that verify, usually in unannounced visits, that suppliers are abiding by the code. Sandberg says that the company has had to reduce THE number of ITS suppliers as ?? standards have gotten higher. H&M’S SUPPLIER BASE HAS SHRUNK BY 200 TO 700 in the last two years, AND IN INDIA ALONE THE BASE HAS SHRUNK BY 20 TO 50 SUPPLIERS.

In the United States, most H & M employees work in the 78CK retail stores. The company is redoubling its efforts to share its CSR initiatives with THE STORES, including training programs for 3,700 employees.

Like Colgate?? and Starbucks, H & M produces a CSR report. The newest version is planned for release late this month. THE COMPANY also includes CSR information in ITS annual report.

II. What’s New

If you wish to attend, please RSVP at http://www.wnsf.org/events.

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

The Network provides a forum for business and professional women to congregate, reflect, and act on the converging issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Through meetings and simple electronic support tools, the Network aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences and best practices on these vital workplace issues. By creating a new network of executive women, the Network seeks to improve responsible practices in workplaces; sensitize corporate culture more generally to issues of sustainability and social responsibility; and encourage a public commitment locally, nationally, and internationally to sustainability principles.

The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future is a 501c3 organization. GIFTS ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE.

For more information, please contact:

Ann Goodman, Acting Executive Director Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future Please direct inquiries to: info@wnsf.org

Board of Directors:

CHAIR: Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President, Interface Inc.; Muni Figueres, formerly of the Costa Rican Foundation for Sustainable Development; Joanne Fox-Przeworski, Director, Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Bard College; Ann Goodman, Acting Executive Director, WNSF; Sarah Howell, Director, Corporate Communications, BP; Michele Kahane, Special Projects Director, Corporate Citizenship Program, Boston College; Clair Krizov, Executive Director of Environmental and Social Responsibility, AT&T; Kathy Robb, Esq., Partner and Head of Environmental Practice, Hunton & Williams; Deborah Sliter, Vice President of Programs, National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.

This issue of Net Notes was written by Karin Borgerson and edited by Ann Goodman. WNSF thanks founding sponsors AT&T and the Ford Foundation for their generous support.

“Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man.” -Stewart L. Udall

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” -Lewis Mumford

Posted in news, Peer Learning Sessions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Business & Buildings: The Sustainability Link

March 2005 Volume III Number 1

Net Contents
I. Network Presentation
Key Learnings
Perspectives

II. What’s New

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

I. Network Presentation
The Women’s Network for a Sustainable (WNSF) future held its first peer learning panel of 2005, Business & Buildings: The Sustainability Link, hosted by Interface, Inc., at the Architecture Center in New York City on February 8. The lunchtime presentation featured three leaders in sustainable building design, reinforcing the case for linking high quality, environmentally sound construction and cutting-edge design with good business practices. Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President of Interface and Chairman of WNSF’s Board of Directors, moderated the lively panel discussion.

Key Findings

  • Traditional building practices often compromise environmental quality, human productivity and health.
  • Green building principles can help business cut costs and improve employee productivity, boosting bottom-line results
  • LEED principles can help guide businesses on state-of-the-art sustainable building strategies
  • Green building strategies provide an array of financial incentives for both developers and owners, producing concrete business benefits
  • There are likely to be increasingly high costs associated with not incorporating green building principles
  • Responsibility to all parties goes a long way toward bolstering cooperation.

Perspectives

Moderator: Joyce LaValle, Interface Inc. Senior Vice President and Chairman of WNSF’s Board of Directors.

Speakers:

  • Hillary Borwn, Principal, New Civic Works
  • Tom Scarola, Director of Engineering, Domestic Development for Tishman Speyer Properties
  • Bob Fox, Principle, Cook+Fox Architects

Hillary Brown, Principal of the sustainable design consulting group New Civic Works and lecturer in Sustainable Design at Columbia and Princeton University School of Architecture, began her presentation highlighting how conventionally-designed buildings—whether for commercial or residential purposes—can waste natural resources (water, materials, energy) as well as human resources. And she pointed out how these traditional building practices in turn can compromise environmental quality, along with human productivity and health.

Green buildings, Brown noted, embody a thoughtful set of alternatives, minimizing use of natural resources and maximizing health, well being and quality of life. Brown pointed to a set of High Performance Principles, or design solutions developed from ‘place-based’ thinking. These principles include:

  • Moving toward climate-neutral energy solutions that more intentionally harness the power of the local microclimate and natural resources.
  • Encouraging constructed systems to mimic the natural counterparts they replace – for instance, taking advantage of building surface areas to capture rain run-off for re-use.
  • Stressing health and well-being through connection with nature.

Brown also discussed the role of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System or LEED®, a national building rating system formulated by members of the U.S. Green Building Council. LEED standards continue to evolve, as designers and builders collaborate with the scientific community and learn more about sustainable design and construction, but LEED’s central goals are to:

  • Define “green building” by establishing a common standard of measurements
  • Promote integrated, whole-building design practices
  • Recognize environmental leadership in the building industry
  • Stimulate green competition in the building field
  • Raise consumer awareness of green building benefits
  • Transform the building market

LEED emphasizes state-of-the-art strategies for sustainable site development, natural resource use efficiency, materials selection and indoor environmental quality. LEED both recognizes achievements and promotes expertise in green building through a comprehensive system offering project certification, professional accreditation, training and practical tools for architects and designers.

Tom Scarola, Director of Engineering, Domestic Development for Tishman Speyer Properties (TSP) illustrated the potential of LEED standards to mainstream the application of green building principles in several current projects.

Scarola highlighted some of Tishman Speyer Properties’ (TSP) efforts to integrate green building solutions into New York City projects, potentially raising demand for environmentally friendly building materials and helping to make green solutions interpretable by smaller developers. Scarola mentioned TSP’s work on parts of Battery Park City designs, the Hearst Building and Goldman Sachs’ new headquarters.

Scarola noted that the environmental benefits of adopting green building strategies come with incentives for developers and owners, including:

  • Minimal increased capital costs for green and sustainable design
  • Minimized operating and maintenance costs associated with inefficient building
  • Green building tax credits
  • Minimized utility costs
  • Increased marketability for building occupants
  • Indoor environmental air quality
  • Increased worker productivity
  • Reduced absenteeism

Green building strategies, Scarola concluded, also contribute to the overall sustainability of the communities surrounding them, partly by reducing impact on local infrastructure.

Bob Fox of Cook+Fox Architects provided a dynamic presentation of the firm’s design project at OneBryant Park, New York headquarters for Bank of America, developed in partnership with the Durst Organization, the developer. Located at the corner of 42nd Street and Sixth Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, the 2.2 million-square-foot skyscraper’s design aims to interact thoughtfully with the site’s past glory and present bustle, recalling the splendor of the glass and steel Crystal Palace built there in 1853. The new building is New York City’s first skyscraper designed to comply with platinum LEED certification, suggesting careful attention to the city’s probable future. For Fox, the building’s design is a direct response to disproportionate consumption habits in the US, whose population of less than five percent of the world’s total consumes over a quarter of its resources. Fox believes Americans must begin to change their living habits, using resources more wisely. Said Fox: “It’s not what it costs to do these buildings, but what it costs not to do them.”

Fox listed the building’s impressive green features—from high-performance glazed floor-to-ceiling windows that capture maximum amounts of sunlight, to “floating” floors that facilitate more efficient heating and cooling, and sophisticated storm water capture and water recycling system. He also detailed the building’s impressive co-generation energy system that will supply 70 percent of the building’s energy annually, reducing demand on the city’s already strapped and relatively inefficient electricity transmission network. Finally, Fox described the building’s air filtration system, designed to emit air much cleaner than what it takes in.

II. What’s New
WNSF will hold its next luncheon panel on April 6 at Colgate-Palmolive Headquarters at Park Avenue and 54th Street in Manhattan. The panel, Corporate Culture Meets Sustainability: Getting the Right Blend, Business & Buildings: The Sustainability Link, will feature speakers from Colgate, H&M and Starbucks. Seating is limited. To reserve a space, RSVP at http://www.wnsf.org/events. Cost is $30, payable in advance by credit card or cash only at the door.

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

The Network provides a forum for business and professional women to congregate, reflect, and act on the converging issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Through meetings and simple electronic support tools, the Network aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences and best practices on these vital workplace issues. By creating a new network of executive women, the Network seeks to improve responsible practices in workplaces; sensitize corporate culture more generally to issues of sustainability and social responsibility; and encourage a public commitment locally, nationally, and internationally to sustainability principles.

The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future is a 501c3 organization, and donations are tax-deductible.

For more information please contact:

Ann Goodman, Acting Executive Director
Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
Please direct inquiries to: mailto:info@wnsf.org

Board of Directors:

CHAIR: Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President, Interface Inc.; Muni Figueres, formerly of the Costa Rican Foundation for Sustainable Development; Joanne Fox-Przeworski, Director, Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Bard College; Ann Goodman, Acting Executive Director, WNSF; Sarah Howell, Director, Corporate Communications, BP; Michele Kahane, Special Projects Director, Corporate Citizenship Program, Boston College; Clair Krizov, Executive Director of Environmental and Social Responsibility, AT&T; Kathy Robb, Esq., Partner and Head of Environmental Practice, Hunton & Williams; Deborah Sliter, Acting President, National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.

This issue of Net Notes was written by Jen Petersen and edited by Ann Goodman. WNSF thanks founding sponsors AT&T and the Ford Foundation for their generous support.

“Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man.” -Stewart L. Udall

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” -Lewis Mumford

Posted in news, Peer Learning Sessions | Tagged | Leave a comment

Community Engagement: Local to Global

December 6 2004 Volume II Number 5

A big thank you to those who took the time to attend WNSF’s luncheon panel on December 6, 2004: “Community Engagement: Local to Global.” The event was hosted by Alcoa and BP at BP headquarters in New York City and featured presentations on company efforts to win local support for facilities construction in an age of rising concern over sustainability. The cases highlighted the creative strategies employed by natural resources companies to engage communities in two markedly different contexts: Crown Landing, New Jersey and Fjardabyggd, Iceland. But their experiences offer lessons to companies in other industries in an age of rising community concern for sustainability.

Key Findings Successful community engagement hinges on humanizing the corporation—internally, by enlightening employees, and externally, in earning credibility among locals.

Getting to know individual community members is an essential step toward engaging with the larger community. In the stakeholder process, it’s better to err on the side of inclusiveness, even if initially it appears to be inefficient or cumbersome. Genuine understanding of and respect for local customs and culture are key to gaining acceptance in the local community.
Measuring the value of the stakeholder process in ways that give responsibility to all parties goes a long way toward bolstering cooperation. Perspectives

Moderator: Michele Kahane, WNSF Board Member and Director of Special Projects, Center for Corporate Citizenship, Boston College.. Speakers:

  • Anita Roper, Director of Sustainability, Alcoa.
  • Neil Chapman, Director of Public Affairs, BP.

Neil Chapman Public Affairs Director at BP, described the need for a liquefied natural gas importation terminal at Crown Landing, New Jersey in order to stabilize natural gas prices and alleviate the tight supply-demand situation for natural gas in the US. Chapman said properties of liquefied natural gas (LNG) make it ideal for transport and storage, demonstrating BP’s commitment to sustainability. Citing the well-organized opposition to LNG projects in different parts of the country , Chapman said that to win stakeholder support in any community where the company is considering constructing a processing facility hinges on successfully addressing safety and security concerns

BP believes it has instigated a number of measures in order to “empower and really hear” local stakeholders in a process that “humanizes the corporation.” What is needed, Chapman said, is “an Erin Brokovich approach,” in which the company makes every effort to get to know community members. In Crown Landing, this has encompassed the following steps:

Gathering local emergency responders to learn about the community’s crisis management infrastructure, then formulating BP’s crisis response plans based on this information and involving local emergency responders

Holding one-on-one meetings with community leaders conducted by BP employees with community organizing skills

Forming Community Advisory Panels When asked whether BP’s efforts had been successful, Mr. Chapman said: “We don’t know yet.”

For more information on the Crown Landing facility, see http://www.bpcrownlanding.com.

Anita Roper, Alcoa’s Director of Sustainability, described the community engagement process guiding her company’s plan to construct a $1 billion aluminum smelter in Iceland (the Fjardaal plant)–the first green field smelter constructed in 20 years. Roper says the company designed its community engagement process to tackle both Iceland’s cultural context and its regulatory environment, neither of which Alcoa had experienced before. Like BP’s Mr. Chapman, she said the process is directly related to the company’s stated sustainability goal: “By using our values, our people, processes and products” to achieve simultaneously:

  • financial success
  • environmental excellence
  • social responsibility through partnerships

Sustainability, she noted, “is really about integrating benefits to shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, and the communities in which we operate.”

In the case of the Fjardaal plan, Alcoa/Landsvirkjun (Alcoa’s local partner) appears to be pursuing this agenda quite seriously—working closely with local leaders and stakeholders and forming an extremely inclusive advisory group composed of individuals representing the Iceland and local governments, environment and international NGOs, tourism industry, church groups, labor unions, indigenous groups, local health organizations, businesses, and academic institutions. The group’s task has been to develop indicators and metrics of sustainability that will govern and evaluate Alcoa/Landsvikjun’s progress toward meeting its stated sustainability goal in the Fjardaal plan. The result is an impressive list of social and environmental indicators and metrics, as well as a breakdown of parties responsible for monitoring each.

Posted in news, Peer Learning Sessions | Tagged | Leave a comment

First Annual Businesswomen’s Sustainability

November 4, 2004

“Inaugural Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Summit”

Presented by the Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future with Catalyst

NETWORKS MAKE THE DIFFERENCE

The first Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Summit, presented by the Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future with Catalyst in November 2004 underscored the power of women’s networks–and networking generally– to make a difference in promoting significant corporate change. This was a common thread woven through a day of lively and challenging presentations and dialogue. Offering attendees a forum in which to connect with other senior women executives who share the convergent goals of creating more responsible business and promoting sustainability, the Summit encouraged from start to finish frank and compelling exchanges of opinions, personal experiences, and ideas among attendees and speakers. The gathering was designed to encourage attendees representing companies from a diverse range of industries to interact with their peers at other corporations. The quality of the dialogue underscored the impact of networking among businesswomen who share a passion for making a difference in areas such as corporate governance, environmental performance, community responsibility, diversity, and the advancement of women–within their companies and in the business community at large. The principal speakers—a former asset manager at one of Wall Street’s most prestigious firms, a senior vice president of one of the world’s largest banks, the president of a pioneering research organization focusing on women in business, and the CEO of an innovative global venture fund—had all experienced the singular power of networking with other high-powered women throughout their careers. All stressed the professional advantages of networking that allow women to build relationships fostering business responsibility and sustainability. Noreen Harrington, the Wall Street veteran who initiated the investigation into illegal practices in the mutual fund industry, highlighted the need for greater attention to business ethics and illustrated how successful women are speaking out when they see improprieties. She also emphasized how a network, while benefiting those included in it, can, if used improperly, also hurt those excluded from it—in this case, small investors. Her example also demonstrates how a single person can still make a difference and influence others.

While working on Wall Street, Harrington came across trading irregularities at Canary Capital Partners, a hedge fund managed by her former employer, Stern Asset Management. She made the initial phone call to New York’s Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, alerting him to the irregularities. After the scandal broke, one in every four mutual fund companies were found guilty and fined some three billion dollars, according to Harrington. “Ninety-five million people were affected by this, and a large number of people knew and prospered, but didn’t do anything”, said Harrington about some of her co-workers in the industry. “Billionaires were stealing from people with small assets and accounts.” Again, as in the cases of whistle-blowing at Enron and the FBI, it was a woman who spoke out about irregularities in her own field, a fact, Harrington said, that didn’t come as a complete surprise to her. Referring to a report from the New York Times, she explained that women are more likely to be whistleblowers mainly because “they work because they want to be valued, they want to make a difference.”

Eliot Spitzer added another dimension to the phenomenon of female whistleblowers in an interview with CBS: “By definition, women aren’t part of the old boy’s network. And somehow the old boy’s network has generated this notion of, ‘Don’t tell anybody what we’re doing.’ Women who have begun to succeed, thankfully, on Wall Street are rising through the ranks and are saying to themselves, ‘Wait a minute, you’re doing what?’”

Interestingly, Spitzer’s focus on exclusion as a reason women blow the whistle was supported by Catalyst’ s latest study on women in business. Forty-six percent of women cited lack of access to informal networks as a main barrier keeping them from advancing in their careers. Catalyst is known for research and practical guides on retaining, developing and advancing women in business. Catalyst also offers advisory services to help companies develop effective ways to capitalize on the talents of all employees and to build inclusive environments.

Catalyst President Ilene H. Lang pointed out that while women occupy over half of all managerial and professional positions in the US, they comprise only 15.7 percent of Fortune 500 corporate officers and hold only 13.6 percent of board seats. They hold only 7.9 percent of the highest titles and represent only 5.2 percent of top earners.

As another Catalyst study called “The Bottom Line” underlines, supporting the advancement of women is not just seen as the right thing to do, it also enhances the company’s financial performance. “Our key finding was that, on average, companies with a higher percentage of women in top management financially outperformed companies with a lower percentage,” said Lang. Return on equity was 35 percent better and total return to shareholders was 34 percent better. The results of this study that covered five years of data for Fortune 500 companies presented a solid business case for gender diversity, argued Lang. “It is statistically significant, it is not random and it holds true across industries,” SHE said.

Lang noted that larger companies usually did better at promoting women. “Successful, large, global companies have to excel everywhere they operate,” said Lang. “They have to be employers of choice and they have to stay close to their target markets. For companies to be successful at this, they have to manage diversity well.” To get to the point of real diversity and truly accommodate women, it takes “a deep committed culture change. That is not easy for companies who think they are doing well already”, explained Lang. (More info about Catalyst’s research at http://www.catalystwomen.org)

Pamela Flaherty, Senior Vice President of Global Community Relations at Citigroup, witnessed this kind of culture change at her own company. She recalled the time when women were not allowed to eat in the corporate dining room. Citigroup has also come a long way on sustainability issues, partly thanks to input from external stakeholders and learning by business people within the company—again highlighting the power of networks, internal and external, to advance change.

Flaherty pointed out that only in the late 1990s did environmental and social concerns become more prominent. But in June 2003, Citigroup was one of the first of 10 leading banks worldwide to adopt the Equator Principles, voluntary guidelines for managing environmental and social issues surrounding project financing. The Principles cover issues like environmental assessments, natural habitats, forestry, and indigenous people as well as pollution guidelines. More banks have joined this network and today, 28 financial institutions have signed the Equator Principles. Various reports put their combined market share between 75 and 80 percent. Citigroup has also adopted other environmental and social risk policies; it tracks its own greenhouse gas emissions, and has a private equity program investing in sustainable forestry, renewable energy and clean technology.

“A company can be profitable and grow and do the right thing. It is mutually reinforcing”, stressed Flaherty. To meet these challenges, the company needs support of senior management and the right internal strategy. Explained Flaherty: “It is important to engage people from the business side. They won’t do anything if they don’t think it makes sense.” While there was initial resistance, real commitment has developed, particularly because the adopted policies help protect the company’s franchise.

Jacqueline Novogratz, founder and CEO of the non-profit Acumen Fund, offered one of the most tantalizing illustrations of how truly networked the world has become. She recalled donating a ski sweater to charity while still in high school. Seventeen years later, while managing a micro-enterprise organization in Rwanda, she encountered a young boy on the streets of Kigali wearing her very sweater, still with her nametag intact.

Acumen Fund, a non-profit global venture fund, provides financial support and management expertise to enterprises that deliver critical goods and services at affordable prices to the four billion people in the world who earn less than four dollars a day. Markets alone won’t solve the problems, and the current approach to development isn’t working, explained Novogratz. She looks at her venture capital firm for the poor as a blueprint for change, with potential for the poor to be active participants.

Acumen supports projects in three critical areas: Health Technology, Housing and Finance and Water Innovations. In identifying new enterprises, Acumen focuses on business fundamentals such as design, marketing, pricing, distribution and financing. It looks for entrepreneurs with strong leadership and for organizations with the capacity for significant growth. The fund supplies grants, loans and equity investments, helps build supportive networks, measures results and demands accountability. Acumen has raised $20 million since its incorporation in April 2001 and has 100 investors.

One of the initiatives supported by Acumen in Tanzania made Time Magazine’s list of the most amazing inventions of 2004: A new generation mosquito net, made of durable polyethylene and impregnated with a long lasting organic pesticide. The invention has not only protected more than 100,000 families in Africa from Malaria, which kills about one million people every year, but also has created over 100 jobs with salaries of 20 to 30 percent above average. (More about Acumen and its work at http://www.acumenfund.org)

The women business leaders who attended the Leadership Summit also participated in round table discussions about how sustainability can best be integrated throughout an organization, how companies can link good governance and social responsibility practices effectively and how women’s leadership initiatives can be woven into corporate citizenship programs. And, they agreed, a key strategy is networking: executive women need networks to advance, and business needs networks to engage with stakeholders—including NGOs—and to learn about opportunities to build socially responsible business practices into their operations. Participants agreed that only corporate management committed to responsibility and sustainability can ensure that employees share these values. This is best done by integrating them into performance measurement systems that reinforce accountability and transparency. Equally important, incorporating sustainability issues into the business strategy insures the long-term interest of the company.

Dianne Dillon-Ridgley, a member of WNSF’s advisory council who moderated the round table discussions, underlined the important role women play in this area: “A lot of times, women have been given the position of director of environment, philanthropy or sustainability, because these positions were considered dead-end positions, not in line towards CEO. But women have taken these positions and used them to push institutions to change. They created change that would not have happened otherwise. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future harvests and hones that experience to really shift the corporate sector and accelerate companies’ moving towards sustainability.”

Due to the very positive response to the summit, WNSF plans to hold a second summit in 2005 and to design a sustainability workshop based on the principles highlighted in talks by the speakers—ethics, diversity, environment and community engagement. The WNSF workshop will be tailored for several audiences, starting with internal corporate women’s networks. The 2005 Summit will again offer executive women a high-level forum in which to exchange ideas, learn from pooled experience and co-create tools and best practices for women’s leadership on corporate responsibility and sustainability.

Moderator: Ann Goodman, Executive Director, WNSF.

Keynote Speakers:

  • Noreen Harrington, WNSF Member Advisory Board
  • Ilene H. Lang, Catalyst President
  • Jacqueline Novogratz, Acumen Fund Founder & CEO

WNSF thanks BP, JPMorganChase and Pfizer for sponsoring the Summit.

For more information about the 2005 Summit or the workshop, including sponsorship opportunities, contact: Ann Goodman
Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
Please direct inquiries to: info@wnsf.org

Posted in Summit Reports | Leave a comment

Ethics and Social Responsibility: Convergence or Divergence?

November 2004 Volume II Number 4

Net Contents
I. Network Presentation
Key Learnings
Perspectives

II. What’s Next?

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

I. Network Presentation
A big thank you to those who took the time to attend WNSF’s luncheon panel on October 4, 2004: “Ethics and Social Responsibility: Convergence or Divergence?” The event was hosted by Bertelsmann at the law offices of Hunton & Williams in New York City. Speakers highlighted the importance of ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in three different industries, media, pharmaceuticals and public relations.

Key Findings

  • The key question, should ethics and social responsibility converge or diverge within a company, was easily answered: CSR needs strong backing by strong company ethics.
  • A related question, why corporate ethics and social responsibility sometimes appear to diverge, was harder to answer. If disconnected from ethics, CSR programs are likely to serve simply as window dressing.
  • It takes top management’s determination to ensure that a company thoroughly adopts and upholds its own ethics standards. CEOs who throw their weight behind corporate codes of conduct are more likely to create the trickle down effect that can ensure compliance.
  • Embedding a CSR program in the strategic business plan and review system tends to motivate employees to internalize the company’s code of conduct. Faced with challenging ethical situations, employees are more likely to understand how the company would expect them to behave.
  • Ethics policies and codes of conduct should apply within the company and among employees, as well as to business conducted with stakeholders outside the company.

Perspectives

Moderator: ANN GOODMAN, Acting Executive Director, WNSF

Speakers:

  • ANDREA BONIME-BLANC, Senior Vice President, Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer, Bertelsmann, Inc.
  • JACQUELINE E. BREVARD, Esq. Vice President, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, Merck & Co., Inc.
  • EMMANUEL TCHIVIDJIAN, Senior Vice President, Ruder Finn

II. What’s Next?

  • WNSF held its last luncheon panel, Community Engagement: Local and Global, on December 6, from noon to 2pm at BP headquarters in NYC. Net Notes for this panel will be distributed soon.
  • WNSF will hold its next luncheon panel on February 8. Invitations and details will be sent shortly.
  • In early November, WNSF held its first Businesswomen’s Sustainability Leadership Summit in New York, bringing together 100 business leaders to confer on businesswomen’s roles in advancing social responsibility and sustainability at companies.
  • Also in November, WNSF chair, Joyce La Valle, spoke on behalf of WNSF at the Business for Social Responsibility conference in New York, serving as interviewer on a panel on a panel about the Calvert principles on women.

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

The Network provides a forum for business and professional women to congregate, reflect, and act on the converging issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Through meetings and simple electronic support tools, the Network aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences and best practices on these vital workplace issues. By creating a new network of executive women, the Network seeks to improve responsible practices in workplaces; sensitize corporate culture more generally to issues of sustainability and social responsibility; and encourage a public commitment locally, nationally, and internationally to sustainability principles.

The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future is a 501c3 organization.

For more information, please contact:

Ann Goodman, Acting Executive Director
Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
Please direct inquiries to: info@wnsf.org

Board of Directors: CHAIR: Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President, Interface Inc.; Muni Figueres, formerly of the Costa Rican Foundation for Sustainable Development; Joanne Fox-Przeworski, Director, Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Bard College; Ann Goodman, Acting Executive Director, WNSF; Sarah Howell, Director, Corporate Communications, BP; Michele Kahane, Special Projects Director, Corporate Citizenship Program, Boston College; Clair Krizov, Executive Director of Environmental and Social Responsibility, AT&T; Kathy Robb, Esq., Partner and Head of Environmental Practice, Hunton & Williams; Deborah Sliter, Vice President of Programs, National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.

This issue of Net Notes was written by Irmintraud Jost. WNSF thanks founding sponsors AT&T and the Ford Foundation for their generous support.

Posted in news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Business Women and Business Responsibility: Results from the NYC Mayor’s Commission on Women’s Survey of NYC Companies

June 2004 Volume II Number 3

Net Contents
I. Network Presentation
Key Learnings
Perspectives

II. What’s Next?

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

I. Network Presentation
Many thanks to those who attended WNSF’s luncheon panel on May 17: “Businesswomen and Business Responsibility: Results of a Report from the NYC Mayor’s Commission on Women’s Issues.” The event, sponsored by McKinsey & Company at its headquarters, highlighted the results of the first survey about women’s status in New York City’s large corporations. It also explored methods to enhance diversity in the workforce and the advancement of women in management.

Key Findings

The report features five New York companies that distinguish themselves in their efforts to recruit, advance and support women in the workforce through special leadership programs and health- and childcare support.

These companies all follow a formal strategy for gender diversity and inclusion. Measurable objectives and metrics to monitoring progress are equally important to successfully implementing a strategy.

While almost all companies surveyed offer leadership programs, only few employers stand out in offering tailored programs for women. Supporting the advancement of women is socially responsible and a good business decision. Women are customers, employees and future leaders.

Perspectives

  • Moderator: Ann Goodman, Acting Director, WNSF.
  • Government: Anne Sutherland Fuchs, Chair, Commission on Women’s Issues for New York City, Senior Advisor, Solera Capital and Director, Latina Media Ventures; Stephanie Cuskley, Commissioner, NYC Mayor’s Commission on Women’s Issues and Managing Director J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
  • Corporate: Jessica Lennon Whitney, Manager, Diversity & People Development, Time Warner Inc.

Ann Fuchs explained her mission to “brand New York City as the best city for women in the country. No city in the world has these advantages for women as New York does.” As Chair of the Mayor’s Commission on Women’s Issues, she has a message for women in New York: “Be safe, be healthy, have a family and be successful.” Fundamental changes in the way companies deal with women’s issues would further enhance New York’s economy and the overall quality of life.

The Commission is divided in five committees, each designed to target a specific aspect of its work: Economic Development, Research, Health, Childcare and Women in Government Liaisons.

  • The Economic Development Committee is assigned to raise awareness about the importance of women entrepreneurs to New York.
  • The Health Committee provides the mayor with suggestions on health-related policy. The committee’s program “Step Out New York City”, launched in March 2004, is designed to promote physical activities and the city’s health website.
  • The Childcare Committee is in the process of building a database for all childcare related information which will be available on a special website.
  • The Women’s Liaison Committee provides resources for the other four committees and ensures that all city agencies keep the goal of the Women’s Commission on their agenda.
  • The Research Committee set the stage for the Commission’s work by answering the question: What does a successful company for women look like? A survey, started with the expertise of McKinsey Inc and funded by Barnard College, looked at the status quo of working women in New York.

The survey, sent to the 90 largest employers in NYC, came up with five “winners”, distinguished companies that are ahead of the field regarding managerial status, career advancement, work/life quality, flexibility and healthcare for their female employees:

  • American Express
  • Deloite & Touche
  • New York University
  • J.P. Morgan
  • Time Warner

Deloite & Touche, for instance, sets objectives to recruit employees, and women make up three quarters of D&T’s total workforce, compared to 55 percent of the citywide average for women in the workforce. The company also has a formal process to ensure women are included and represented in succession planning.

The other distinguished companies also offer women’s management and leadership programs. New York University reports that women comprise 60 percent of its managerial ranks, compared to the average 45 percent for survey respondents.

American Express is closely following with 55 percent of female managers.

J.P. Morgan Chase, D&T and Amex all have a formal policy for flexible working arrangements and provide health care insurance benefits for part-time employees. Time Warner offers on-site childcare. NYU and J.P. Morgan offer active assistance to help employees quit smoking. Lung cancer is now the number one cancer in women. Each of the five distinguished companies has a designated gender diversity executive assigned to these issues.

By identifying employers and their best practices to advance women, the Commission will be able to set benchmarks for other companies.

Working on the advancement of women is in a company’s own interest, Fuchs explained. Women are customers, they make 83 percent of all consumer purchases, they are employees comprising 55 percent of the workforce and they are future leaders, providing 30 percent of new business school students.

The Research Committee’s next project will focus on the 500,000 women in NYC without a college degree in order to improve education and related information for women.

As a representative of one of the companies recognized in the “Working for Women in NYC” survey, Jessica Lennon Whitney detailed Time Warner’s approach to increase diversity. She explained that the company used the AOL-Time Warner merger to redefine the values and strategic vision for the company. “During this time, diversity emerged as both a core value and as a true business imperative for us as the largest media and entertainment company in the world.” The new strategy comprises several key components, including:

  • Suppliers and vendors – Time Warner looks at women and minority- owned businesses when the company chooses new business partners. A testament for this policy is the new Time Warner Center at Columbus Center, built with the help of a top women-owned construction company.
  • Investments – Time Warner has a diversity-focused investment strategy that singles out companies owned or run by minorities.
  • Philanthropy and Outreach – Commitment to strengthen the communities in which the company does business.
  • New Markets and Content – Expand base in underserved markets, makes products appeal to a diverse America.
  • Workforce – To build a workforce that is inclusive and diverse. To implement strategies to support and strengthen workforce diversity. A new model, Time Warner Foundations of Leadership, places a strong emphasis on developing people in all divisions of the company.

The workforce diversity strategy has a number of initiatives that relate to developing and advancing women, including:

  • Time Warner Women’s Network – More than 300 women (VP level and above) from the NYC area from all divisions have the opportunity to meet, network, build relationships across divisions and assist the company in providing leadership and development opportunities and— as a byproduct–advance business.
  • Leadership development – A week of intense leadership training for 30 high level women from all divisions in cooperation with Simmons School of Management. The program also offers strategic networking with company executives.
  • Workforce Planning – Review of key talents, annual workforce diversity action plan, succession planning, employee opinion surveys.

Time Warner was recently recognized by Diversity Inc as one of its 50 Companies for Diversity.

Stephanie Cuskley introduced the Mayor’s Commission on Women’s Issues’ newest project: The Small Business Award program, whose slogan is “NY loves Women.” The initiative, in cooperation with the city’s Department of Small Business Services, seeks to honor women-owned businesses for their effort, inspiration, success and contribution to the city’s economy in general. “Small businesses are the key driver in the U.S. economy”, Cuskley stressed. The award is also a means to raise awareness of the resources that are available for small businesses and the website describing them. The Commission raised $400,000, which will be given to model women business owners in installments of up to $ 30,000. Male small business owners may also apply if their businesses help women. Applications will be accepted through September 15, 2004, and information is available on the website http://www.nyc.gov/html/cwi/smallbiz/home.html

The goal for the awards program and the surrounding publicity campaign is to increase the confidence level of women in NYC so they can be more successful in the business world. The winners are to be announced early next year.

II. What’s Next?
Look for an email invitation to the next NYC luncheon panel. “ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENCE?,” to be hosted by Bertelsmann on October 4.

III. The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
The Concept of the Network

The Network provides a forum for business and professional women to congregate, reflect and act on the converging issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Through meetings and simple electronic support tools, the Network aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences and best practices on these vital workplace issues. By creating a new network of executive women, the Network seeks to: improve responsible practices in workplaces; sensitize corporate culture more generally to issues of sustainability and social responsibility; and encourage a public commitment locally, nationally and internationally to sustainability principles.

The Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future is a 501c3 organization.

For more information, please contact:

Ann Goodman, Acting Director
Women’s Network for a Sustainable Future
Please direct inquiries to:
Eugenia.shafer@us.interfaceinc.com

Fiscal Agent:
National Environmental Education & Training Foundation
1707 H Street NW, Suite 900
Washington, D.C. 20006
T: 202-833-2933
WNSF Board Member/NEETF Liaison: Deborah Sliter, Vice President of Programs

Board of Directors: Linda Descano, COO, Women & Co., CitiGroup; Muni Figueres, formerly of the Costa Rican Foundation for Sustainable Development; Joanne Fox-Przeworski, Director, Bard Center for Environmental Policy, Bard College; Ann Goodman, President, Telesis Consulting and Acting Director, WNSF; Clair Krizov, Executive Director of Environmental and Social Responsibility, AT&T; Joyce LaValle, Senior Vice President, Interface Inc.; Kathy Robb, Esq., Partner and Head of Environmental Practice, Hunton & Williams; Deborah Sliter, Vice President of Programs, National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.

This issue of Net Notes was written by Irmintraud Jost and edited by SUSAN RIFKIN OF MCGRAW-HILL’S ‘WRITERS TO THE RESCUE’ VOLUNTEER PROGRAM.

WNSF thanks founding sponsors AT&T and the Ford Foundation for their generous support.

“Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man.” -Stewart L. Udall

“Forget the damned motor car and build the cities for lovers and friends.” -Lewis Mumford

Posted in news, Peer Learning Sessions | Tagged , | Leave a comment